Global carbon emissions by country10/4/2023 Outside the world of climate diplomacy, some argue foreign aid would be better spent fighting malnutrition, improving education, and otherwise helping - ings become - eds. ![]() In 2015, China went further, pledging $3.1 billion in climate-related aid, though not within the U.N. Back then, it was a big deal when China declared it would not compete with other - ings for a share of the money. conference in Copenhagen, the - eds agreed to transfer $100 billion a year to poor countries encumbered by climate change ( they have fallen short of that commitment). ![]() Even so, Beijing has started to act more like - ed nations over the years. Reclassifying China as an - ed would need the unanimous agreement of nearly 200 nations, a virtual impossibility. Along that spectrum, two things are clear: richer countries emit more carbon dioxide, and China is starting to look more like a rich country than a poor one. Reality often defies classification, so it comes as no surprise that the - ed/-ing binary fails to capture the full spectrum of national development. We are just this special species when it comes to the global stage,” Li Shuo, a senior policy adviser at Greenpeace East Asia, told me. “China is neither a developed country nor a developing country. China declined to join them - for all its progress, it does not see itself as an - ed yet. Recognizing this, rich countries last year committed to pay reparations to Pakistan and other countries harmed by climate change. Climate change likely made a bad situation worse. Yet rain in the flooded region has grown more intense because of global warming, according to World Weather Attribution, a global collaboration of scientists. Last year’s flooding in Pakistan, for instance, caused an estimated $30 billion in economic losses - a toll that would have been smaller had it been 1962, when Pakistan’s population was 48 million, instead of 2022, when it was 242 million. Still, the best available science suggests today’s extremes surpass what natural climate variability alone would be expected to produce. Extreme weather is not new, and it has become costlier in part because there are now more people, buildings and infrastructure in harm’s way. ![]() Whether it pays for them is another.Īccounting for carbon’s costs is tricky. Whether China limits its emissions is one question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |